Popular Posts

Showing posts with label Land Rover. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Land Rover. Show all posts

Thursday, January 13, 2011

2010 Land Rover LR4 Review

Reviewing the 2010 Land Rover LR4, Before there were "SUVs" there were Land Rovers - the four-wheel-drives of the country gentry. The only thing American-made that was even close was the old Jeep Wagoneer.


Then came the SUV boom - driven by the home equity-affluent middle class. $50,000 SUVs became as common as IROC-Z Camaros once were back in the late 1980s.

These days, a 12 mpg $50,000 SUV is the four-wheel-drive equivalent of an underwater mortgage on a suburban McMansion. At least, for the no-longer-equity-affluent middle class. They won't be buying $50,000 SUVs anytime soon. And the bread-and-butter brands probably won't be building them for much longer as a result.

But Land Rover will probably survive. Like Porsche, it is an exclusive brand that sells a relatively small number of vehicles to a relatively small and highly exclusive clientele: People who don't worry about gas mileage - or own tract development McMansions.

WHAT IT IS

A heavily updated version of the previous LR3. It's a mid-sized, ultra-luxury 4WD SUV that can seat up to seven people with the optional third row. Prices start at $47,250.

WHAT'S NEW FOR 2010

The LR4 is equipped with an all-new 5.0 liter 375 hp V-8, replacing last year's 4.4 liter, 300 hp V-8. The interior has also been updated as well - with a new hard-drive-based navigation system, Bluetooth wireless connectivity, iPod hook-up and satellite radio.

WHAT'S GOOD

Seventy-five more horsepower helps the LR4 cope with its massive curb weight (nearly 6,000 lbs. empty) much more effectively.

Simplified, updated interior is less cluttered - and more functional. Iconic brand status; by far the most capable off-roader in its segment - and one of the most capable off-road vehicles you can buy, period.

It's a steal compared to a Porsche Cayenne S ($60,700), Benz ML550 ($56,750) or BMW X5 4.8i ($56,300).

WHAT'S NOT SO GOOD



New 375 hp V-8 still has to haul almost 6,000 lbs. of curb weight - so while it's quicker than before it's still not quick. Snorks down gas like a '75 FLeetwood d'Elegance.

Superb off-road tenacity is great if you really do need to go off-road and know how to drive off-road. But if you don't - and intend to drive your LR4 like a standard car, on-road (especially in corners) you may not like its heavy, ponderous handling.

No diesel engine for U.S. buyers. (Land Rover sells an excellent diesel V-6 in Europe.)

UNDER THE HOOD

The new LR4 comes with one standard powertrain - a 5.0 liter all-alloy V-8 rated at 375 hp teamed with a six-speed automatic and automatic four-wheel-drive.

Last year's LR3 was underpowered - which sounds a little off given it did have 300 hp. But 300 hp is marginal when close to 6,000 lbs. of SUV is yoked to it. It took the LR3 about 8.3 seconds to reach 60 mph - in the same ballpark as most economy compacts such as a Toyota Corolla. That simply won't do. The LR4's new V-8 cuts the 0-60 time down by almost one full second, to about 7.5 seconds. It's not fast, but it's fast enough to get away from $13,000 prolemobiles and that is an absolute must.

Towing capacity (7,716 lbs. max) is the same as last year. So is gas mileage, rated by the EPA at 12 city, 17 highway. It's not going to make the global warming crowd happy, but it should impress prospective buyers given the new model at least matches the old model's efficiency even though it has a larger and much more powerful V-8 under the hood.

The LR4 has an extremely sophisticated 4WD system that's fully capable of dealing with severe conditions such as deep mud, steep inclines and declines, crawling over large rocks and through heavy snow and a foot of running water. The system features terrain-sensing technology that adjusts throttle response and tailors engine output to individual wheels.

Via a console mounted rotary knob, the driver can select for conditions ranging from gravel/grass/snow to mud and ruts to rock crawl. The system features low range gearing, locking front and rear axles, Hill Descent Control and an adjustable height suspension system that can be raised up or lowered at the touch of a button.

ON THE ROAD

The thing to know about the LR4 relative to others in this segment is that it is a real-deal, no compromises 4WD. The thing will literally go just about anywhere - and get back out, too. This extreme off-road capability makes it almost unique in its class/price range. Competitors like the Mercedes-Benz ML Class and BMW X5 are much more street-oriented and far less capable off-road. Pretty much the only vehicle that can go toe-to-toe with the LR4 off-road (and also compete with it on luxury) is the Lexus GX460.

But the LR4's off-road strength is also its on-road weakness. The beast weighs nearly three tons - 5,833 lbs. before the driver climbs onboard. To get a handle on just how bone-crushing heavy that is, check out the curb weight of the Benz ML550: just 4,795 lbs. The LR4 is more than 1,000 lbs. heavier. It's also about 1,000 lbs. heavier than a Porsche Cayenne S (4,949 lbs.) and 500 pounds heavier than the BMW X5 (5,335 lbs.) and Lexus GX460 (5,305 lbs.) There's just no hiding that heft once the LR4 gets rolling.

Land Rover has done a commendable job idiot-proofing the thing by building in plenty of understeer - not to mention the always-alert electronic stability control system that keeps the vehicle right-side up even when driven with zero respect for what it is - and what you shouldn't do with it.

Driven reasonably, it's fine. The problem is there are a lot of people who have no clue how to reasonably drive real SUVs like the LR4. It's these people who might not be happy with this vehicle. They want the looks of a rugged off-roader and maybe the iconic brand cachet of owning a Land Rover. But the truth of the matter is they'd be be better off in a street-friendly light-duty SUV or crossover such as the Benz ML or BMW X5.

But if you do appreciate a real-deal 4WD, you will just love the LR4. Every detail has been conceived with serious use in mind. The seating position affords a commanding view all around you. The upright front glass and side panels never leave you guessing where the road drops off. The GPS system has terrain mapping (including topographical details) and there's even a display showing your steering angle - eliminating the need to get out and check when you're trying to crawl over and around tricky obstacles.

Driving an LR4 off-road - even in the worst conditions imaginable - is a lot like having a platoon of Marine Force Recon head-kickers with you in a really bad neighborhood. You feel absolutely 100 percent secure you're going to make it through.

AT THE CURB

The LR4 looks like a real-deal SUV ought to look. It's boxy and upright and purposeful. Exterior styling updates for 2010 include new fender vents and a lattice grille (replacing the LR3's triple bar grille). The interior has been much more obviously updated, with a completely new center stack and simplified control layout. Larger, rotary knobs replace the confusing array of Chiclet-sized buttons used in the LR3. A nice touch is a new analog clock. But it's the only old-fashioned thing about the LR4.

Unique Land Rover features include a heated front windshield, which has an embedded defroster grid - plus available heated washer jets and heated steering wheel (along with heated seats) that comes with the optional Cold Climate equipment package.

The tall profile and two-piece rear gate help make the most of the available interior space (including 90 cubic feet of cargo capacity, more than the Benz ML and BMW X5, which have 72 and 75 cubic feet respectively - and much more than the puny 65 cubic feet in the Lexus GC460).

The third row seating that comes with the HSE package makes it feasible to carry up to seven people but the third row is not adult-friendly, at least not for more than very short trips. Still, it's perfectly suitable back there for kids and young teens - and that gives the LR4 more versatility than SUVs and crossovers that don't offer a third row at all.

There is more front-seat headroom in the LR than in the Benz ML, BMW X5 and Lexus GX460 - and noticeably more legroom than all of these except the ML, which has about the same (42.2 inches).

The LR4's off-road bona fides have been discussed. The only price-competitive vehicle that can touch it is the Lexus GX460 - but it's still a couple thousand bucks more expensive to start and its 301 hp V-8 is much less powerful than the LR4's mighty 5 liter V-8. It can tow more than the the GX460 (6,500 lbs. max), too.



THE REST

Land Rover, the company, is very much like it corporate partner, Jaguar - in the sense that both build beautiful, appealing vehicles that have unfortunately had more than their fair share of quality control issues. However, things have been improving and while there's no way to know until we have a few years of real-world data to examine, it's a decent bet that the LR4 will prove much better in terms of reliability and minor/major gremlins than previous Land Rover vehicles.

The basic (comprehensive) warranty is pretty good at four years and 50,000 miles. The powertrain warranty, though, doesn't extend a mile (or day) longer. It's the same four years, 50,000 miles - which would seem to mean it's largely irrelevant. Wouldn't the basic warranty also cover any powertrain-related problem that comes up during that first four years and 50,000 miles?

Land Rover could boost buyer confidence by extending the powertrain coverage another year - or three - beyond the envelope of the basic warranty. Every current safety technology is standard except for third row curtain air bags, which are included when third row seats are ordered. A surround-view parking camera system is available that works through the 7-inch LCD display in the center console.

THE BOTTOM LINE

If you're able to afford such a vehicle - and need real-deal 4WD capability - nothing can touch the LR4.


Tuesday, October 5, 2010

Reviewing the 2010 Range Rover Sport


Reviewing the 2010 Range Rover Sport, How many sport-utilities are actually "sporty"? Utility - ok. They usually have lots of room and can carry lots of stuff. Most are good in the snow (or at least, better than a car). But sporty? That's another story!

Among high-dollar SUVs, only two really qualify. One is the Porsche Cayenne; the other is the Range Rover Sport, subject of this review.

WHAT IT IS

The Range Rover Sport is - you guessed it - a sporty (and slightly smaller) version of the Range Rover, the high-end, full-size 4WD SUV built by Britain's Land Rover. It's about half a foot shorter, four inches narrower through the hips and weighs about 150 pounds less than than the regular Range Rover.

It's also a lot less expensive - $59,645 for the HSE and $73,345 for the more powerful supercharged version - vs. $78,425 for the regular (slightly larger) Range Rover and $94,275 for the supercharged version.

WHAT'S NEW FOR 2010

2010 Range Rovers (both the Sport and the regular Rover) get a larger, more powerful standard 5.0 liter V-8 as well as a new six-speed automatic transmission and several key upgrades to features and equipment, including revised automatic 4WD programs and a new (hard drive-based) GPS navigation system.

WHAT'S GOOD

The price is a steal - basically the same Range Rover for almost $20k less.

Half the price of a Benz G550 (the only other uber-premium SUV that matches the RR's cachet as well as its off-road prowess). Supercharged version is $27k less than comparably powerful Porsche Cayenne Turbo.

Acceleration now appropriate to price - and better than some of the comparably priced competition

It does handle better, is easier to park/maneuver than the standard (larger/heavier) Range Rover - while giving up nothing as far as presence/exclusivity and features/amenties. Same tremendous off-road capability, too.

WHAT'S NOT SO GOOD

Headroom's a little tight (the price you pay for the extra sportiness). Gas mileage (13 city for the non-supercharged version) limits the range of this Rover - even with a 23.3 gallon tank. It's not hard to run it dry in 200 miles of real-world driving.

Fill-ups are forbidding - even for the affluent clientele that shops Land Rovers: About $70 a pop at current prices of $3 per gallon. Way too nice to actually take off-roading - just like all the others in this segment!

UNDER THE HOOD

The 2010 Range Rover Sport is equipped with a new (larger) and much more powerful 5 liter V-8 for 2010, with or without a supercharger. Without the supercharger, the V-8 produces 375 horsepower. With it, the power jumps to 510 hp - making it on of the strongest engines on the market, period.

Porsche's $99,900 Cayenne Turbo offers a "mere" 500 hp; to top the RR's power you'll have to pony up a staggering $126,300 for the 550 hp Turbo S.

The Mercedes-Benz G500, meanwhile, carries a 5.5 liter V-8 that makes 382 hp - about the same as the RR Sport. But like the Cayenne Turbo, the G500's base price of $104,400 puts in another orbit, almost.

With the new 5 liter, 375 hp V-8, the non-supercharged '10 Range Rover Sport accelerates from 0-60 as quickly as the 2009 supercharged Range Rover sport (7.2 seconds). With the supercharged version of the 5 liter engine, the 0-60 time drops to an extremely quick 5.9 seconds - quicker than the price-comparable Cayenne GTS (6.1 seconds for $72,400) and enough to harry the enormously more expensive six-figure Cayenne Turbo (4.9 seconds).

Impressively, gas mileage for the '10 RR is actually slightly better than before, too - even though the new model has larger and much more powerful engines. The non-supercharged 5 liter V-8 manages 13 city, 18 highway vs. the old 4.4's slurpalicious 12 city, 18 highway.

Both versions of the new 5 liter V-8s are teamed up with an also-new six-speed automatic transmission and Land Rover's impressively capable full-time 4WD system, which comes with multiple settings for different types of terrain and conditions such as Mud and Snow, Sand and Rock Crawl - as well as driver-selectable 4WD Low range gearing.

Maximum trailer towing capacity is 7,700 lbs. - same as the Cayenne but more than twice the Benz G500's startlingly meager 3,500 pound rating.

ON THE ROAD

The additional power is literally transformative - and equalizing. Last year's Range Rover Sport with the 300 hp 4.4 V-8 was on the borderline of slow - at least, for a vehicle at the top of the proverbial food chain in terms of brand status and snob appeal.

It took the '09 RR Sport about 8.2 seconds to reach 60 - about what a Toyota Corolla can manage. No one who buys a nearly $60k (to start) vehicle wants to be looking at the cheesy rubber bumper of a $13k car.

The Range Rover's just to heavy for even 300 hp to be sufficient. In '09, it was almost mandatory to buy the much more expensive supercharged version - which even then wasn't actually quick, just acceptable.

So, the new 375 hp is wonderful news - and not only because it makes the standard RR quick enough and responsive enough to stand up to Porsches.

The broader point is it's no longer essential to spend the additional $14K to upgrade to the supercharged version. The 510 hp engine now truly optional - in the sense that it's something you decide to buy because you want neck-snapping speed, not merely enough reserve on tap to pull safely onto a busy road or make a fast pass.

The other aspect of the RR is that, relatively speaking, its handling is sporty - at least, much more so than the very capable off-road but horribly clumsy on-road Mercedes Gelandewagen. That thing is a beast - one of the few new SUVs you can buy that still feels as though it might roll over taking corners at normal, posted speeds. The traction/stability control system come on constantly if the G is driven even a little bit aggressively on asphalt. There's really no comparison; the RR is exponentially more civilized - yet manages to remain just as capable of hitting the dirt (or crawling over rocks) as the G550.

The Cayenne beats the RR on-road, with 911-sharp steering and excellent reflexes overall. But it's more car-like design limits what it can do off-road (at least relative to the hunky Range Rover) and if you really do need the 4WD toughness, it's advantage RR.

A wild card: The Lexus GX460 offers similarly poised on-road manners as well as beefy off-road capability, but like last year's RR, the Lexus is underpowered, with just a 301 hp 4.6 liter V-8 under its hood (and no stronger optional V-8 available).

All in all, nothing else out there can match the straight-line acceleration (even in base trim), off-road bona fides and curb appeal of the Range Rover Sport - at least, not for $59k and change.

AT THE CURB

Land Rovers have a classic upright/boxy shape you either like - or don't. The current model could be parked next to a 1970s-era model and though there are numerous small changes and upgrades, the basic profile is like father-to-son.

It's a handsome vehicle in my opinion. Not brutal-looking like the Benz G550 (a vehicle whose military origins are obvious). It stands out, too - something the plain-looking Lexus GX460 doesn't do.

The RR Sport is physically smaller than the standard Range Rover (the RR Sport's wheelbase is 108 inches vs. 113.3 for the standard RR) but visually it's hard to tell the difference unless you park them side-by-side. In no way does the RR Sport seem less substantial or downgraded.

Both the RR Sport and the regular Range Rover seat five and - surprisingly - there's actually more front and rear seat legroom in the physically smaller RR Sport than in the larger overall regular Range Rover (42.4 inches/front seat legroom vs. 38.9 inches and 37.6 inches of rear seat legroom vs. 35.5). Headroom is tighter in the Sport, though (38.5 inches up front vs. 39.3 in the regular Rover) which can be a problem for taller drivers.

Cargo capacity is almost identical: 71 cubic feet for the RR Sport vs. 74 cubic feet for the regular Range Rover.

The fact that the Sport has about the same interior/cargo room as the larger-on-the-outside standard Range Rover is pretty cool. The fact that it handles/maneuvers more nimbly as a result of its arguably better use of space even more so.

You don't really lose anything by going with the RR Sport over the regular Range Rover - except sheer bulk and perhaps a bit of off-road capability under extreme conditions (the regular RR has a bit more ground clearance and its wheel/tire packages are more dirt-oriented than the aggressive performance rubber fitted to the RR Sport).

THE REST

The Range Rover appears to be meticulously put-together but it is a very complex vehicle with extremely complex sub-systems, most notably the Terrain Sensing 4WD. Previous Land Rover models have sometimes had bugs and could sometimes be unusually expensive to maintain. That said, there's a helluva cushion built into the RR Sport's $59k starting price - which is nearly $20k less than the base price of the larger on the outside but otherwise very similar standard Range Rover. That makes up for a lot, even if some bugs do crop up.

Land Rover provides a better-than-average four-year, 50,000 mile basic/powertrain warranty, too - which roughly tracks when most typical Rang Rover buyers would be about ready to trade-in.

Safety-wise, the RR comes with "everything" - including Hill Descent Control (electronically controls throttle and brake action to prevent the RR from building up excessive speed going down a steep grade) and (in supercharged versions) an emergency braking function that will slow (and even stop) the vehicle automatically if the cruise control is on and the driver doesn't notice traffic slowing down and begin to brake on his own.

THE BOTTOM LINE

It's a bit weird to be talking about any vehicle with a nearly $60k starting price as a "bargain" - but that's what the Range Rover Sport is. The new V-8s, meanwhile, fix the one real flaw this model had.

The end result is a very appealing high-end Sport Ute that can honestly be called sporty - without making a fool of oneself.


Sunday, August 8, 2010

2011 Land Rover Evoque (base price $37,000 )


The Evoque, in contrast, will be the smallest, lightest and most fuel-efficient Land Rover model the company has ever produced.

Thematically, it'lll be similar to the Batmobile-looking Acura ZDX. Which means, style and curb appeal share equal billing with functional considerations. It will be slightly smaller than the current LR2 and set up to seat only four people in a more intimate, sports-coupe-like layout. The rear area will be mostly for cargo though fold-away jumpseats may be offered.

The standard powerplant will be the same basic 3.2 liter engine used in the current LR2, producing 230 hp. It's possible a hybrid gas-electric version will be available, too - though probablynot before 2012.

Scheduled launch for the Evoque is late 2010 or early 2011.